Written by Bill Polley, Ph.D., Director of Business Intelligence, Quad Cities Chamber
One of the most exciting events of the Olympic Games is the gymnastics competition. The feeling of suspense builds as the routines become more complex. As the athlete nears the end of the routine, you can almost feel the crowd holding its collective breath as the athlete flies through the air toward the landing that will make or break the entire performance. The stakes are high as the landing alone can be the difference between a gold medal and nothing at all. Then comes the feeling of elation when the athlete "sticks the landing," as they say. The phrase itself has become part of everyday language to indicate the successful completion of a task.
Over the last year, economic commentators have spoken of the prospects for a "soft landing" after a long cycle of interest rate increases by the Federal Reserve. Much like a gymnast desires to land a routine in such a way that absorbs the shock and avoids crashing to the ground, so the Federal Reserve wants to allow economic activity to slow down, but not fall too much. A strong economy can absorb the shock, pause the fast pace of growth momentarily and then resume a sustainable pace going forward.
In monetary policy, the stakes are even higher than in the Olympics. Instead of a gold medal, the prize is avoiding a recession and preventing unemployment from spiking too high. Furthermore, the Federal Reserve only gets one chance to get it right. Turning points like the present one have happened just a handful of times in the last generation. So it is easy to see why so much attention has been given to this topic lately. While the discussion has been ongoing for a while, we are at last reaching that critical phase that makes or breaks the entire routine.
At the time of this writing, the advance estimate of real gross domestic product (GDP) growth for the second quarter was 2.8%. This was up from the final estimate of 1.4% for the first quarter. This was better than some expected. As I noted in our last Quarterly Market Report (late May), the Blue Chip consensus ranged from about 1 to 3%, so the actual number came in near the top end of the professional forecasters' expectations.
Ordinarily, a strong GDP number like this would not be associated with talk of the Fed cutting interest rates. As I wrote last quarter, a number over 2.5% could have given cover to inflation hawks. However, this is not an ordinary situation, and since May the labor market - which was in much better shape in the first quarter - has weakened enough that there are no more arguments remaining that would prevent a rate cut in September. On August 23, Fed Chair Jerome Powell gave one of the most anticipated and most consequential policy speeches in recent memory at the Fed's annual symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyoming. The message of that speech can be summed up in his own words, "The time has come for policy to adjust. The direction of travel is clear, and the timing and pace of rate cuts will depend on incoming data, the evolving outlook, and the balance of risks." The market has interpreted those words as meaning that a rate cut in September is essentially a done deal. Concerning the labor market, Powell said, "It seems unlikely that the labor market will be a source of elevated inflationary pressures anytime soon. We do not seek or welcome further cooling in labor market conditions." Quite a change from even a few months ago.
The current Atlanta Fed GDPNow forecast for the third quarter is 2%. However, the Blue Chip consensus is just under 2%. As with the second quarter, I think the Blue Chip consensus is going to be closer. The Atlanta Fed number has come down from earlier in the month, and will probably converge toward the Blue Chip consensus. It is also possible that second quarter GDP as well as the next couple quarters will be revised downward. Early estimates tend to be a little high around turning points, or even inflection points.